Archive for the ‘Spinal Manipulation-significantly better than NSAID’s for lowback pain-Spine Sept 2012’ Category

Spinal Manipulation-significantly better than NSAID’s for lowback pain-Spine Sept 2012

October 17, 2012

Posted by:  Kevin G. Parker, D.C. 

Pub Med:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 28. [Epub ahead of print]

Spinal HVLA-Manipulation in Acute Nonspecific LBP: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial in Comparison With Diclofenac and Placebo. HVLA:   high-velocity-low-amplitude  manipulation

von Heymann WJ Dr Med, Schloemer P Dipl Math, Timm J Prof Dr Rer Nat, Muehlbauer B Prof Dr Med. Orthopedic Practice, Bremen University Bremen.

Conclusion:  In a subgroup of patients with acute non-specific Low Back Ppain- spinal manipulation was significantly better than NSAID Diclofenac and clinically superior to placebo.
ABSTRACT:: Study Design. A randomized double blinded placebo-controlled parallel trial with three arms.

Objective. To investigate in acute non-specific low back pain (LBP) the effectiveness of spinal high-velocity-low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation compared with the non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac and with placebo.

Summary of Background Data.

LBP is an important economical factor in all industrialized countries.

Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in comparison to NSAIDs or placebo regarding satisfaction and function of the patient, off-work time and rescue medication.

Methods. A total of 101 patients with acute LBP (<48 h) were recruited from 5 outpatient practices, exclusion criteria were numerous and strict.

The subjects were randomized to three groups:

1. spinal manipulation and placebo-diclofenac,

2. sham manipulation and diclofenac,

3. sham manipulation and placebo-diclofenac.

Outcomes registered by a second and blinded investigator included self-rated physical disability, function (SF-12), off-work time and rescue medication between baseline and 12 weeks after randomization.

Results. 37 subjects received spinal manipulation, 38 Diclofenac and 25 no active treatment.

The placebo group with a high number of drop outs for unsustainable pain was closed praecox.

Comparing the two active arms with the placebo group the intervention groups were significantly superior to the control group.

93 subjects were analyzed in the ITT-collective.

Comparing the two intervention groups, the manipulation group was significantly better than the Diclofenac group (Mann Whitney test: P = 0,0134).

No adverse effects or harms were registered.

Other related articles:

Healing Time of Soft Tissue

Back Pain-Insider Secrets revealed-San Fran Gate 2012

A New Gatekeeper for Back Pain

Why Does Back Pain Recur?

Fibroblast cells in Healing

Fish oil-Neurosurgeon for the Pittsburgh Steelers

Foam Roller for Back Pain

Exercise Makes Us Feel Good-NY Times 2011

Gluten Free Diet helped Nerve Pain-Neurology 2010

Inflammation-13 Tips To Fight Inflammation

Laser Therapy in Rehabilitation-Irvine California

Low Back Pain Studies 2010

Magnesium Deficiency

Muscle Trigger points vs Acupuncture points

Neck pain-Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2004

Nerve ingrowth into chronic painful disc-Lancet 1997

Nerve Supply of the lumbar disc-JBJS 2007

Omega 3’s-Molecular Neurobiology-January 2011

Omega 3′s and Nerve pain-Clinical Journal of Pain 2010

Self Movement Screen

Sitting-Can sitting too much kill you? Scientific American Jan 2011

Vit. D-What We Have Learned About Vitamin D Dosing

If you are suffering from: Sports Injuries, Sprains, Strains, Car accident,  Herniated Disc, Disc Bulge, Degenerative Disc Disease, Neck pain, Headaches, Low back pain, of just want to feel better and have better life performance– please call our office in Irvine, California- at 949.857.1888or visit our website at ADJUST2IT to learn more about Functional Fitness ChiropracticSports massageMyofascial Release, Corrective Exercise, Non Surgical Spinal Decompression, Class IV laser, Functional Endocrinology and Functional Nutrition.

Advertisements